Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:48:08 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <8632-Tue22Apr2003104808+0300-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <10304211406.AA25239@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu)
Subject: Re: nmalloc revisited
References:  <10304211406 DOT AA25239 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 09:06:55 -0500 (CDT)
> 
> The only way to get a more extensive test is to put it in an 
> alpha test of the entire build suite.  So in a word, yes - if
> we could get the issues resolved I'd want to incorporate it

I second that.