Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 20:32:05 +0200 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk Message-Id: <1858-Sun20Apr2003203205+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <3EA2B7E2.E83694EA@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard Dawe on Sun, 20 Apr 2003 16:08:18 +0100) Subject: Re: fstat, fd_props and inventing inodes, revision 3 [PATCH] References: <003101c30704$8dbb1ea0$0100a8c0 AT acp42g> <000a01c30708$aacbc680$0100a8c0 AT acp42g> <3EA2685E DOT 725043BC AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <8296-Sun20Apr2003135633+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <3EA2B7E2 DOT E83694EA AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 16:08:18 +0100 > From: Richard Dawe > > There's only one call to get the list of shares. Sorry, I forgot the function numbers and was thinking about AX=5F02h, not 5F46h. The former returns one redirector entry at a time. > Presumably you mean that the error is an internal error in the code > implementing Int 21h/AX=5F46h Yes. Hmm, I wonder whether all DOS versions we support have support for 5F46h. RBIL seems to imply some enhanced LAN software should be installed: --------N-215F46----------------------------- INT 21 u - LAN Manager Enhanced DOS - LOCAL NetUseEnum > That seems a bit odd, when there is a status field in > the use_info_1 structure (which I called "share_info" in the code). I don't see a reason why it should return any info about unavailable resources. If a drive is unavailable, it simply doesn't exist, as far as any program is concerned; you cannot refer to it without hitting Int 24h. Btw, do we have any info on how long does it take for 5F46h to do its job on a typical system?