Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 20:21:05 +0200 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se Message-Id: <5137-Sun20Apr2003202104+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <200304201640.h3KGeiSB026891@speedy.ludd.luth.se> (ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se) Subject: Re: @var, -, @code? References: <200304201640 DOT h3KGeiSB026891 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: > Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 18:40:44 +0200 (CEST) > > Is "If @var{endp} ..., @code{*endp} ..." right? No. It should be @code{*@var{endp}}. But since that's a mouthfull, I'd suggest to rephrase like this: If @var{endp} is not a null pointer, it points to the first unconverted ...