Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 07:58:03 +0200
From: Laszlo Molnar <laszlo DOT molnar AT eth DOT ericsson DOT se>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Perl 5.8.0 diffs
Message-ID: <20030414075803.S6644@libra.eth.ericsson.se>
References: <3E9470A3 DOT 99362D5 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <20030410082836 DOT I6644 AT libra DOT eth DOT ericsson DOT se> <005801c2ff52$32e0a720$0100a8c0 AT acp42g> <20030410165217 DOT O6644 AT libra DOT eth DOT ericsson DOT se> <3E97FA89 DOT 5A3223AF AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <3E97FA89.5A3223AF@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>; from rich@phekda.freeserve.co.uk on Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 12:37:45PM +0100
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 12:37:45PM +0100, Richard Dawe wrote:
> I have a few patches to the Perl 5.8.0 tarball. It would be good if they could
> be incorporated into Perl 5.8.1, so it works better out-of-the-box. Should I
> send these patches to you or directly to the Perl maintainers?

Send the patches to the perl5-porters list please.

> Are you still actively maintaining DJGPP support in the Perl development
> versions? (It doesn't sound like it to me, but perhaps you are.)

No, I'm not.

Laszlo