Message-ID: <3E7CCBE4.7A754421@yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 15:47:32 -0500 From: CBFalconer Organization: Ched Research X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: nmalloc revisited References: <200303141601 DOT RAA26911 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <3E7B8D9D DOT EEE854B1 AT yahoo DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com CBFalconer wrote: > Martin Stromberg wrote: > > ... snip ... > > > > Some test case in djgpp/test. I don't remember exactly where but > > tests/libc/ansi/stdlib/ is not impossible. It tried to use the > > malloc debug hooks. > > > > > debugging systems, but the debug interface remains in nmalloc, > > > > You can't be using up-to-date information. It's checked in in CVS. > > You can get a current version of malloc.txh here: > > . > > I have just mounted a revised version of nmalloc.zip, which can > supply all the features of that debug package AFAICT. There is > still some work to be done to integrate things better, and to > resolve the semantics of the debug levels. It includes the > provisions to alter the output file for the debug dumps discussed > here with Eli, and the use of some fields in mallocinfo to show > the count of free space blocks etc. > > I think any remaining work will be largely cosmetic. Lets have > people flog this. > > The revised package is at: > > ADDENDUM: I compiled the tmalldbg via the make file on CYGWIN, with no problems, and the result ran immediately. Just unpacked the zip into a directory and hit "make tmalldbg.exe". Will people who are trying it PLEASE let me know. This deafening silence is somewhat disconcerting. -- Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net) Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems. USE worldnet address!