Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 22:33:20 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-Id: <3405-Wed19Mar2003223319+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3E78AA1D.23720139@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:34:21 +0000)
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.04 release? [Was: Re: nmalloc revisited]
References: <10303182107 DOT AA24101 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <3E7868E9 DOT 19949F8E AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <9003-Wed19Mar2003174940+0200-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <3E78AA1D DOT 23720139 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:34:21 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> Yup. So for stat'ing directories we use _truename on that and then
> _invent_inode to invent an inode for it. This will ensure we always return the
> same inode for directories. Admittedly I haven't looked particularly closely
> at the code.

Now I'm confused.  You've said previously that `stat' would return a
different inode for the same file each time it is called.  Then you
said that the same solution we've used in `fstat' will help with
`stat'.  Now you are evidently saying that what `stat' does is okay?

Perhaps if I saw an example of the problem, I could stop being
confused?