Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:51:39 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-Id: <2110-Wed19Mar2003175139+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3E786C49.98016A87@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:10:33 +0000)
Subject: Re: Timetable for 2.04 releases
References:  <3E786C49 DOT 98016A87 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:10:33 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> 2.04 alpha 2 - two to three months after alpha 1

I'd suggest to plan on more alpha releases and ship them more often.

In general, only 4 pre-releases (2 alphas and 2 betas) sound too few
to me.

> FWIW I also read the other day that FreeBSD is not C99-compliant with respect
> to its maths functions. I think we can add the C99 maths functions at any
> point in the cycle above.

I have no problem with that.