Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:49:41 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-Id: <9003-Wed19Mar2003174940+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3E7868E9.19949F8E@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Wed, 19 Mar 2003 12:56:09 +0000)
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.04 release? [Was: Re: nmalloc revisited]
References: <10303182107 DOT AA24101 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <3E7868E9 DOT 19949F8E AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 12:56:09 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> > > Apparently stat doesn't return the same inode each time on Win2k/XP.
> > 
> > OK.
> 
> I don't think this will be difficult to fix. It would be similar to the
> proposed fix for fstat.
> 
> The fstat fix uses the stored file name from fd_props, which is the true name
> of the original file name, then uses _invent_inode on that.

Then how will ``a similar fix'' for `stat' solve the problem?  `stat'
already uses the real name of the file, right?

What am I missing?