Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:38:37 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <3405-Wed19Mar2003173837+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <200303190912.KAA04773@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> (message from Martin
	Stromberg on Wed, 19 Mar 2003 10:12:14 +0100 (MET))
Subject: Re: strto{d,f,ld}, inf and nan patch
References:  <200303190912 DOT KAA04773 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT epl DOT ericsson DOT se>
> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 10:12:14 +0100 (MET)
> > 
> > > +If @var{s} is @code{NaN(<integer>)}, with any variations of
> > 
> > "<integer>" should be "@var{integer}".
> > 
> > Btw, do we really intend to support non-hex values here?
> 
> No. I was planning on a strtoull(x, y, 0) but then I'll use
> strtoull(x, y, 16) instead.

In that case, I suggest to say "@var{hex-number}" instead of just
"integer".