Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 08:22:30 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <7704-Tue18Mar2003082230+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <200303171813.h2HIDTh03633@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
	(ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se)
Subject: Re: isnan and isinf
References:  <200303171813 DOT h2HIDTh03633 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 19:13:29 +0100 (CET)
> 
> Now that isnan() and isinf() and their friends are in C99, should the
> code in libm be moved into libc?

IMHO, we should indeed have these functions in libc.a, but perhaps a
simpler code could be written to implement them.  While at that, how
about supporting IA32-specific bit patterns for Inf's and NaN's (see
the Intel manual for details)?