Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID: <3E762FE9.21D8BDA@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 20:28:25 +0000
From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: strto{d,f,ld}, inf and nan patch
References: <200303171829 DOT h2HIT1K03708 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se wrote:
> 
> Hello.
> 
> According to Richard Dawe:
> > @port-note <standard> <comments>
> 
> Thanks. How about:
> 
> @port-note ansi-c99 Support for (incasesensitive) @code{Inf},
> @code{NaN} and @code{NaN(@dots{})} was standardised in ANSI C99.

You should say "case-insensitive" instead of "incasesensitive". I'm not sure
you should mention case-insensitivity in that sentence though. Maybe put it as
a separate sentence in the port-note:

     They are treated case-insensitively.

or, better IMHO, describe them in the stro* info pages.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]