From: <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200303171829.h2HIT1K03708@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: strto{d,f,ld}, inf and nan patch
In-Reply-To: <3E75A26E.18FCF9E5@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> "from Richard Dawe at
 Mar 17, 2003 10:24:46 am"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 19:29:01 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamScore: s
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Hello.

According to Richard Dawe:
> @port-note <standard> <comments>

Thanks. How about:

@port-note ansi-c99 Support for (incasesensitive) @code{Inf},
@code{NaN} and @code{NaN(@dots{})} was standardised in ANSI C99.  


Right,

						MartinS