Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 19:44:06 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <2110-Sun16Mar2003194405+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <3E7215B4.73C72345@yahoo.com> (message from CBFalconer on Fri, 14
	Mar 2003 12:47:32 -0500)
Subject: Re: The reply-to field is missing
References: <3E71ECB7 DOT A4AAAAF7 AT yahoo DOT com> <200303141623 DOT h2EGNrg01961 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3E7215B4 DOT 73C72345 AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 12:47:32 -0500
> From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
> 
> I get enough spam anyhow, thankyou.

FWIW, I always use my true address, and never had any special problems
with spam.  Yes, I do get circa 10-20 spam messages per day (out of
about 250), but it takes precisely 1 second to recognize spam and
press that DELETE button.

IMHO, people who play tricks with their addresses make the living
harder for their good-willing fellas much more than they harm
spam-senders.