X-Sybari-Trust: 9f61ce19 9ffcebbb a5ee123c 00000138
From: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT epl DOT ericsson DOT se>
Message-Id: <200303140805.JAA26575@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject: Re: nmalloc revisited
To: cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:05:03 +0100 (MET)
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com (DJGPP-WORKERS)
In-Reply-To: <3E713255.B2A42BDB@yahoo.com> from "CBFalconer" at Mar 13, 2003 08:37:25 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Sorry CBFalconer, you'll get this twice (or three times). Reply-To
rules seems to have changed.

> BTW the nmalloc.c code has not been altered since June 2002, and
> the overall package is unaltered since November 2002 (some
> documentation changes and testing).  It remains available at:

So it remains incompatible with the debugging machinery already
present in DJGPP?

I'll back out my local incorporation of it as it seems it never will
be (and some DJGPP test case(s?) won't build).


Right,

						MartinS