Message-ID: <003101c2e15c$1df98d90$0100a8c0@acp42g>
From: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To: "Andris Pavenis" <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>, <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>,
   "Charles Sandmann" <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Cc: "Richard Dawe" <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>,
   "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
References: <10303011649 DOT AA17394 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <200303030938 DOT 22635 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
Subject: Re: Next Clio 2.04 release
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:08:46 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> > If possible grab the latest (beta?) UPX and build the images with it, so
> > we can see it it works.
>
> It seems that beta 1.90 is still the latest. So problems with latest
versions
> of GCC and binutils are fixed only in CVS. So one needs to build UCL
(instead
> of NRV which is not publically available) and CVS version of UPX. I still
> think that we can wait a bit and don't use UPX for some (hopefully not
very
> long) time.
UCL 1.01 is available. I did a UPX CVS get and the build failed becuase I
was missing one file (so far).

I couldn't see any notes in the changes log or news file about a fix, so I
will have to wait and try again later.

Andrew