From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann),
   acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au (Andrew Cottrell)
Subject: Re: Next Clio 2.04 release
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:38:22 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
Cc: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk (Richard Dawe),
   eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii), djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <10303011649 DOT AA17394 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
In-Reply-To: <10303011649.AA17394@clio.rice.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200303030938.22635.pavenis@latnet.lv>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On Saturday 01 March 2003 18:49, Charles Sandmann wrote:
> > In the next 12 hours does anyone have any objections or reservations for
> > another update to the files at clio?
>
> It's probably time
>
> If possible grab the latest (beta?) UPX and build the images with it, so
> we can see it it works.

It seems that beta 1.90 is still the latest. So problems with latest versions 
of GCC and binutils are fixed only in CVS. So one needs to build UCL (instead 
of NRV which is not publically available) and CVS version of UPX. I still 
think that we can wait a bit and don't use UPX for some (hopefully not very 
long) time.

Andris