Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 20:57:05 +0100 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Moving djasm Message-ID: <20030223195705.GD5774@sprite.fr.eu.org> Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com References: <6480-Sun23Feb2003003102+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <200302231735 DOT h1NHZ9006363 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200302231735.h1NHZ9006363@speedy.ludd.luth.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i From: Jeremie Koenig Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 06:35:09PM +0100, ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se wrote: > -$(INFO)/%.inf : %.tex > +$(INFO)/%.info : %.tex > + makeinfo --no-split $< > + > +$(INFO)/%.info : %.txi > makeinfo --no-split $< BTW, as i'm creating a djgpp package for debian, i've had a look to the makefile system. I've cooked a patch for the Makefile system to make it output things in another tree. I still have problems with info to achieve this, and i think you should use the -o option to makeinfo, and drop direct references to ../../info from the texinfo file. Just my .02... -- Jeremie Koenig