Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 17:47:38 -0500
Message-Id: <200302222247.h1MMlci22356@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <6480-Sun23Feb2003003102+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Subject: Re: Moving djasm
References: <200302221801 DOT h1MI1n220923 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <6480-Sun23Feb2003003102+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Shouldn't we say %.info instead of %.inf?

Yes.

> > (Isn't .tex an incorrect extension?)
> 
> I'd prefer if we used *.txi.

We should use *.texi of course ;-) (I think that's where the "*.tex"
came from).

But .txi is fine with me too.