From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.04 status page
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 16:25:55 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
References: <10302181734 DOT AA21449 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
In-Reply-To: <10302181734.AA21449@clio.rice.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200302201625.55843.pavenis@latnet.lv>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On Tuesday 18 February 2003 19:34, Charles Sandmann wrote:
> > >         The default stack size: stubify now has an option. Does it
> > >         solve that problem(, Andris)?
> >
> > I did not update anything for this item.
>
> The build procedures for GCC need to use this new option to fix the
> problem... but this does seem to fix the item on the V2.04
> release worklist.  Might just say stubify has been enhanced to support
> this, but GCC build procedures do not yet use it.

It seemed to be some temporary problem. Currently GCC-3.3 prerelease CVS 
version builds with 512K stack (perhaps one time it was more "stack hungry").
Anyway it was already a second time, when for some package it was needed 
to increase stack size (first was running tests of one of earlier versions of 
GSL, where I needed >1.5Mb). So I think possibility to set stack size will be 
OK. It's only necessary to provide some option for GCC to support it (it's 
easy as only specs should ne modified)

Andris