From: <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200302151030.h1FAUWx08576@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: djasm in djasm?
In-Reply-To: <20030214191621.GA2427@kendall.sfbr.org> "from JT Williams at Feb
 14, 2003 01:16:21 pm"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 11:30:32 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to JT Williams:
> But should we go one step further and create djasm/src, djasm/doc?
> Suppose that parts of djasm.y are later moved into separate, more
> manageable files, e.g., djasm.y, emit.c, emit.h, error.h, omf.c, omf.h,
> symbol.c, symbol.h (taken from an independent development tree).

Do you have this independent tree today? If so, show us how it looks
so we see how many files are involved.

It would be rather silly to move something today, only to move it
again next week/month.


Right,

						MartinS