X-Authentication-Warning: kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 13:16:21 -0600 From: JT Williams To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: djasm in djasm? Message-ID: <20030214191621.GA2427@kendall.sfbr.org> Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com References: <200302141822 DOT h1EIMO102255 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200302141822.h1EIMO102255@speedy.ludd.luth.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk -: I've moved stub/djasm* to djasm/ ("mkdir djasm; mv stub/djasm* djasm") -: and have a successful compilation. The docs (src/utils/djasm.txi, src/utils/shift.txi) should be relocated too. But should we go one step further and create djasm/src, djasm/doc? Suppose that parts of djasm.y are later moved into separate, more manageable files, e.g., djasm.y, emit.c, emit.h, error.h, omf.c, omf.h, symbol.c, symbol.h (taken from an independent development tree).