Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 21:57:44 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <1659-Mon10Feb2003215743+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <001601c2d0e2$0b6f1210$0100a8c0@acp42g> (acottrel@ihug.com.au)
Subject: Re: [karl AT gnu DOT org: texinfo 4.5 available]
References: <3791-Wed05Feb2003203549+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <005c01c2ce60$77c7cbc0$0100a8c0 AT acp42g> <001801c2d01a$53fe7f70$0100a8c0 AT acp42g> <2950-Sun09Feb2003174810+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <001601c2d0e2$0b6f1210$0100a8c0 AT acp42g>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 19:54:00 +1100
> 
> I found that config,bat did rename it. I did a grep for makefile.in.in and
> couldn't see what would have caused the problem. I re-installed autoconf and
> automake just in case I had modified them, but I still got the smae problem.
> I did a diff against the texinfo 4.2 directory using winmerge and there were
> allot of files that changed.
> 
> Any ideas where to look?

It's possible that config.sed doesn't edit configure to replace all
instances of Makefile.in.in with Makefile.in-in.