Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID: <3E477A39.32B8464C@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 10:08:57 +0000
From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJGPP headers: C99, free-standing, bugfixes [PATCH]
References: <200302081135 DOT h18BZDf23590 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se wrote:
> 
> According to Richard Dawe:
> > * According to the C99 standard, the defines in <stdarg.h> should be
> >   available for free-standing implementations. So I moved the #ifdef
> >   on __dj_ENFORCE_ANSI_FREESTANDING to after the definitions. I also
> >   added two sections for C99 stuff: one for free-standing implementations
> >   and for one normal implementations.
> >
> >   Was <stdarg.h> supposed to be able for free-standing implementations
> >   in C89?
> 
> Are you talking about chapter 4 paragraph 6? If so an almost identical
> text is present in C89.

Yes.

> The difference is that iso646.h, stdbool.h and stdint.h isn't there.
[snip]

They're new to C99, so that isn't surprising.

Thanks for looking that up.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]