Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk Message-ID: <3E43D181.3C981D27@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 15:32:17 +0000 From: Richard Dawe X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586) X-Accept-Language: de,fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: BNU 2.13.2.1 query References: <10302071435 DOT AA24969 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Hello. Charles Sandmann wrote: [snip] > Unless it fixes working with UPX, or someone understands why these changes > are happening - I think we should just say NO to newer binutils and stick > with something older that works. But that's up to whoever is using it :-) [snip] UPX 1.9, which is a testing release, purportedly fixes the problems with later versions of binutils. So it seems likely that problem with binutils & UPX will go away soon. Bye, Rich =] -- Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]