X-Authentication-Warning: kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 08:29:39 -0600
From: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: djgpp: djgpp/src/libc/compat/string/strlcat.txh,strlcpy.txh
Message-ID: <20030125142939.GA18814@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <5567-Fri24Jan2003214557+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <10301242126 DOT AA12306 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <10301242126.AA12306@clio.rice.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

-: 1) Should we move djasm.txi to the stub directory tree where
-:    the source is?
-: 2) Should shift.txi be included into djasm.txi (instead of a
-:    separate file) ?  Right now if we move one, we must move both,
-:    or combine them.

IMHO all djasm-related files should be moved into their own directory,
e.g., src/djasm or src/utils/djasm.  Currently this affects only
stub/djasm.y, src/djasm.txi, and src/shift.txi.  djasm.info would be
built and installed to info/ as an independent document, not as part of
the documentation for utils.

If a djasm tree is created, someone familiar with building the djgpp
distro would have to tweak a few Makefiles, to make sure djasm.exe is
built before building stub.exe.

A separate djasm tree would make it worthwhile to upload additional
documentation (djasm/info) and examples (djasm/example).  I have not
introduced any more of Bill Currie's source changes because his next
steps involve splitting djasm.y into separate files (thus djasm/src).