Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk Message-ID: <3E31D5B8.18BB887E@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 00:09:28 +0000 From: Richard Dawe X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586) X-Accept-Language: de,fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: ssize_t: int -> signed long [PATCH] References: <200301242237 DOT h0OMbnY12551 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Hello. ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se wrote: > > According to Richard Dawe: > > is > > allowed to define anything that does. > > Uh, what? Where have you found that? New POSIX, draft 7. C99 doesn't seem to say this, though. Does anyone have a final copy of the new POSIX standard to check? Maybe this changed between the draft and final release? This isn't actually relevant to the ssize_t change, since ssize_t isn't defined in . I wasn't proposing that we actually include 's definitions in - it's not a requirement. Bye, Rich =] -- Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]