From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10301241838.AA12471@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: info/dir.txi
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 12:38:56 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <200301241653.h0OGr8008715@speedy.ludd.luth.se> from "ams@ludd.luth.se" at Jan 24, 2003 05:53:08 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> With Charles new documentation, dir.txi needs more entries.

I was also planning to do symify, edebug32 and fsdb.
(symify should be meaty, with stuff stolen from FAQ + bfdsymify linkage,
edebug32 and fsdb will be light and refer to internal documentation).
That will add 3 more entries - so I was going to do dir.txi last
all at once.  But feel free to go ahead with what's already there.

My new docs don't forward/backward node link across include files, so
I hadn't decided what to do there yet either.

And I have to fix the index notation on the other two include files.

But if I get hit by a truck, or my wife, or the hard disk crashes -
you've got useful items for now ...

> Take a look at dir.txi. Should the descriptions be aligned nicely (cf.
> utod, djecho, gxx, redir).

Is there an extra space of indentation below for descriptions for
the new items?

(No real preference as long as it works)