Message-ID: <006001c2bf9f$7e46a720$0100a8c0@acp42g>
From: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>, <wojciech DOT galazka AT polkomtel DOT com DOT pl>,
   "Richard Dawe" <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Cc: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT softhome DOT net>
References: <250B3114DA16D511B82C00E0094005F809D31B49 AT MSGWAW11>
Subject: Re: GCC 3.2.1 build failure 
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 20:44:28 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Wojciech,

Which version of Bash are you using and what is it's date? If I use Bash
that I built back in October it works, but the bash I built in December does
not work. They are both built with the the same source from 28-Aug-2002.

This would imply that somewhere between 18-Oct-2002 and 3-Dec-2002 that :-
a) A change was made to the CVS code that affected the way bash worked or
or
b) I upgraded some package and it affected the way Bash works
or
c) Something else went wrong........ Any ideas on this one.

If I run the following under Bash 2.05b just built using sources of
14-Jan-2003 I get the error, but if I run it in a cmd.exe shell it works:-
find ./. -name '*.h' -type f -print

Failure under Bash in the include directory:-
    DJ204 D:\dj204\include>bash
    bash-2.05b$ dirs
    d:/dj204/include
    bash-2.05b$ find ./. -name '*.h' -type f -print
    d:/dj204/bin/find.exe: paths must precede expression
    Usage: d:/dj204/bin/find.exe [path...] [expression]
    bash-2.05b$

CMD.EXE output:
    DJ204 D:\dj204\include>find ./. -name '*.h' -type f -print
    ././allegro.h
    ././ar.h
    ././assert.h
    ././bios.h
    ././bzlib.h
    ././coff.h
    ././conio.h

What I expect to do next is to trace through the Bash processing to see what
changes in the CVS code could have affected it. If someone can think of a
change that would affect Bash like this could they please let me know ASAP
or if you think I am wasting time by looking at Bash could you please let me
know where you think I should be looking.

If you want to try this out on your PC go and grab the Bash exe from clio in
a few hours.

Thanks,
Andrew
----- Original Message -----
From: Wojciech Galazka
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:29 PM
Subject: RE: GCC 3.2.1 build failure


I had no problems building gcc321 from gcc321s.zip from simtel using
binaries from clio I grabbed on Friday and gcc321b.zip from simtel on
Win2000. Is ithis problem solely XP related ?