Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 15:47:47 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Message-Id: <9003-Sat18Jan2003154747+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: <3E294591.3B479E28@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard Dawe on Sat, 18 Jan 2003 12:16:17 +0000) Subject: Re: perl 5.8.0 from w2k test site problems References: <200301171326 DOT OAA26148 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <1042815386 DOT 11058 DOT 15 DOT camel AT leeloo> <3E28A7CA DOT B6063543 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <1438-Sat18Jan2003133202+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3E294591 DOT 3B479E28 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 12:16:17 +0000 > From: Richard Dawe > > A scheme like converting Foo::Bar.3 to Foo__Bar.3 might not work very well, > because some module prefix may be > 8 characters. The resulting mappings would > not be unique for a module prefix with lots of submodules. (My terminology is > probably wrong here.) So VitalModule::Bar and VitalModule::Baz would have > conflicting man page file names. We could do something similar to module names > and put them in subdirectories, e.g. VitalModule::Bar.3 -> VitalModule/Bar.3, > but this will require special support in our man. How about VitalModule::Bar.3 -> VitalModuleBar.3?