Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk Message-ID: <3E294591.3B479E28@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 12:16:17 +0000 From: Richard Dawe X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586) X-Accept-Language: de,fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: perl 5.8.0 from w2k test site problems References: <200301171326 DOT OAA26148 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <1042815386 DOT 11058 DOT 15 DOT camel AT leeloo> <3E28A7CA DOT B6063543 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <1438-Sat18Jan2003133202+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Hello. Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 01:03:06 +0000 > > From: Richard Dawe > > > > I thought installing skipped copying of the man pages on DOS systems? At > > least, that's what I remember from Perl 5.6.1. I don't remember having to > > do anything special - it's something that is disabled by default for the > > dos-djgpp target, I believe. > > I think it's unfortunate that part of docs is not installed in the > DJGPP port. I've thought a little bit about this. A scheme like converting Foo::Bar.3 to Foo__Bar.3 might not work very well, because some module prefix may be > 8 characters. The resulting mappings would not be unique for a module prefix with lots of submodules. (My terminology is probably wrong here.) So VitalModule::Bar and VitalModule::Baz would have conflicting man page file names. We could do something similar to module names and put them in subdirectories, e.g. VitalModule::Bar.3 -> VitalModule/Bar.3, but this will require special support in our man. The other alternative I thought of was to give up on man and fix the HTML pages, which may be easier to fix and not require support in man. But that's probably not very useful for people using plain ol' DOS. Bye, Rich =] -- Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]