Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:05:52 -0500 Message-Id: <200301102105.h0AL5qL32514@envy.delorie.com> X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT delorie DOT com using -f From: DJ Delorie To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <1190-Fri10Jan2003224212+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> Subject: Re: old packages on simtel References: <200301092228 DOT h09MSuY23423 AT brother DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <200301092244 DOT h09MiFC18715 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <1190-Fri10Jan2003224212+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Out of curiosity, why? Is traceroute dangerous in some way? Any protocol not required for the services provided is at risk for future compromises.