Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 22:34:00 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <4331-Fri10Jan2003223400+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <E18WkK2-00014U-00@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
	(rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk)
Subject: Re: strlcat, strlcpy, revision 2 [PATCH]
References:  <E18WkK2-00014U-00 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 21:35:54 +0000
> From: "Richard Dawe" <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> Here's revision 2 of my implementation of strlcat & strlcpy
> for DJGPP. Changes:
> 
> * include the fact that the buffers shouldn't overlap in the docs;
> * cope with dest having no nul-termination (docs and testcase included).
> 
> Thanks to David F. for the commentary. NetBSD seems to behave
> the same way as OpenBSD BTW. At least, that's what it seems
> from the NetBSD man pages I downloaded off the web.
> 
> OK to commit?

Fine with me.

Thanks.