Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID: <3E1D3CDB.1172ADAA@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 09:11:55 +0000
From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: binutils 2.13.2.1; make 3.80
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1030109075838 DOT 16256E-100000 AT is> <001901c2b7bd$7fd89ec0$0100a8c0 AT acp42g>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Andrew Cottrell wrote:
> 
> > > I was going to suggest that someone (i.e.: me) could prepare packages of
> it
> > > built against 2.03.
> >
> > That'd be nice, I think.
> >
> > I mentioned Andrew because you could use a small patch he has to build
> > Make 3.80 with no problems.
> The source including the patch is up on clio as a zip with the dsm and
> relevant mft file.

Thanks. I downloaded it the other day. But I think I will try to clear out all
my 2.04-related stuff, before I look at making packages against 2.03 again.
(Unless it's a package I already maintain for 2.03.)

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]