Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 20:36:44 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <2110-Mon06Jan2003203644+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: bdeck AT lycos DOT co DOT uk
In-reply-to: <3E196182.AC93EFB3@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Mon, 06 Jan 2003 10:59:14 +0000)
Subject: Re: your mail
References: <200301052343 DOT h05NhdA28743 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <3E196182 DOT AC93EFB3 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 10:59:14 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> > 
> > Here. We prefer patches made with "diff -pruN" or "diff -prN", if I'm
> > not mistaken.
> 
> I seem to remember Eli expressing a preference for context diffs (-prcN) a
> while back.

I did?  Actually, I don't mind either -c or -u (and prefer -u
slightly).  But perhaps someone else asked for -c.  I know Richard
Stallman always asks for that, but his preferences are not relevant
for this list...