Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 21:06:30 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org
Message-Id: <1190-Tue08May2001210630+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <20010508112700.H23521@kendall.sfbr.org> (message from JT
	Williams on Tue, 8 May 2001 11:27:00 -0500)
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.04 release date
References: <200105072211 DOT SAA25769 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010508103514 DOT 3965P-100000 AT is> <20010508091744 DOT B23521 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <3405-Tue08May2001175703+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <20010508112700 DOT H23521 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 11:27:00 -0500
> From: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
> 
> -: Please explain why do you think so, especially given the fact (or
> -: rather my estimate) that the number of plain DOS users nowadays should
> -: be insignificant.  Even though I'm one of them.
>                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> Well, that's a better reason than any other I could give you... ;-)

I don't consider myself important enough ;-)

> I don't know how large is the `plain DOS + DJGPP' army, but for me
> it's been an incredibly useful combination.

Same here, but I don't feely too bad about not having long file
names.

I'm not against having the LFN TSR as part of DJGPP, if it's ready for
prime time, though.