X-Authentication-Warning: kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 11:27:00 -0500
From: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.04 release date
Message-ID: <20010508112700.H23521@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>,
	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <200105072211 DOT SAA25769 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010508103514 DOT 3965P-100000 AT is> <20010508091744 DOT B23521 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <3405-Tue08May2001175703+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3405-Tue08May2001175703+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>; from eliz@is.elta.co.il on Tue, May 08, 2001 at 05:57:04PM +0300
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

-: Please explain why do you think so, especially given the fact (or
-: rather my estimate) that the number of plain DOS users nowadays should
-: be insignificant.  Even though I'm one of them.
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Well, that's a better reason than any other I could give you... ;-)

I don't know how large is the `plain DOS + DJGPP' army, but for me
it's been an incredibly useful combination.  DOS 5.0 is the only
piece of M$-ware I still own, and I realized long ago that I would
simply move to Linux if/when I found DOS+DJGPP no longer suitable.

-: No offence, but personally, I'd hesitate to let any TSR futz with my
-: disk on the sector level.

It certainly has it's hazards, but I would expect the TSR to get
the same critical scrutiny and careful development that any of the
low-level DJGPP routines get.