From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 18:17:22 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: __dosexec_find_on_path question
Message-ID: <393405B2.29847.3864CE@localhost>
In-reply-to: <200005302148.AAA10657@alpha.netvision.net.il>
References: <3933DE1E DOT 13566 DOT 25B201 AT localhost> (snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com)
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Is something wrong with adding a flag to the interpreters[] structure,
> saying whether each one of the extensions should be looked for?  It's
> essentially your original idea, except that it doesn't assume that the
> extensions are ordered in some particular way.

Plain simple forgetfullness.

Mark