From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200005301850.UAA28285@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: djgpp: djgpp/src/libc/posix/utsname/uname.c,uname.txh
In-Reply-To: <200005301832.OAA10449@envy.delorie.com> from DJ Delorie at "May 30, 2000 02:32:46 pm"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 20:50:05 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to DJ Delorie:
> 
> > > Should these be "static" ?
> > 
> > Why?
> 
> Because they pollute the namespace if they aren't.

What name space? uname()'s? Isn't that function allowed to pollute it
own name space (local variables)? Or am I missing something?


Right,

							MartinS