Sender: oliva AT ic DOT unicamp DOT br To: law AT cygnus DOT com Cc: Laurynas Biveinis , gcc-patches AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org, DJGPP Workers Subject: Re: Fixproto fix References: <10288 DOT 959147375 AT upchuck> From: Alexandre Oliva Organization: Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat Company Date: 24 May 2000 03:00:05 -0300 In-Reply-To: Jeffrey A Law's message of "Tue, 23 May 2000 23:49:35 -0600" Message-ID: Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0805 (Gnus v5.8.5) XEmacs/21.1 (Capitol Reef) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id CAA28781 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com On May 24, 2000, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > In message <3924D74A DOT 352A36A6 AT softhome DOT net>you write: >> Jeffrey A Law wrote: > My point is on a unix system ':' is an allowed file/directory name. I understand your point. However, if you have some `:' as part of some of your build directories, you'll hardly be able to build anything, since `:' will get `make' so confused that you'll quickly give up on using it. Therefore, using this expression to match full pathnames has been widely accepted by portable configuration packages such as autoconf and libtool (I'm not sure automake has needed any such tests). Refusing to use it in GCC won't bring us any advantage. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guaranį, see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com Free Software Developer and Evangelist CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Write to mailing lists, not to me