X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <5AFF1420.9030705@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 19:57:52 +0200
From: "Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101206 SUSE/3.1.7 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJGPP on NTF with SFN creating disabled [was : gcc-8.1.0 packages
 for testing]
References: <0244cff9-6176-8aec-bbc2-6fc49602c295 AT iki DOT fi> <558b5ff2-71df-e556-a874-7acbb264c84a AT iki DOT fi> <5AED9B44 DOT 90000 AT gmx DOT de> <df616b96-646c-788b-3177-87de740f03ae AT iki DOT fi> <5AEF5D3A DOT 2030409 AT gmx DOT de> <3569b441-e678-7252-ffdd-7c45f72a5c56 AT iki DOT fi> <5AFDE635 DOT 9030405 AT gmx DOT de> <83muwxijf0 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <5AFF1112 DOT 20804 AT gmx DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <5AFF1112.20804@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:cjrDq0ZEjvdpzalXmQTVTnVwRifm/sXkqHeYyuOqIVYuVdxrCaW
 MFEnMGlLs5jrlni2sXU9AQGXih4MIidgI97Zlx/pGbZrvWdU3fVQFXcJwO/ll1ITboloCQR
 w2Y5GxBxxKPeYhlkWvN6V9DyddBMoOtvq2L+raS9FHTmfqn1oP7+dJemHBJaG1nQ0dM3jbS
 j6dbt3j0+hs2gG647O52A==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:AlOKiripPo4=:nV4q5v83a2gqmjm2/83sQb
 HPNar9tRAkgQRZyzzP/FB9PJf/Af4pTDa2q1XtTfjR374NNrHU77qVpHY+GefL+9+3zLDbEBT
 qUWBukCTzpRDQo9DLNLt99G1q2XrqR2jW3hp1hqe3l3qHK4HLcseRqYUtAJYTUM4n8ZMnVIrP
 QMId++DINcpxcc9akPMcqknsSAqlxepuvsRDtcUQcNTNUJ3is7nYgGyOtkgXTMuxjaUfGnUeV
 hFKNO2ic5uC/Ivo5JgUTH4GPHR+NipJ4D8kfZgzpHYQQSNvslrZyQtMlrSD27i0fQic2zsH5N
 JA4+bnA4hjwnE56+jSQz/18XOj/dvRrjiAwq5sTJI8ejwuU9H3esuU7qpBB3q7qWr1B6TOaWF
 b6TJqvEY7GSvb+i8s2pqGBBDOJ5CVppsvlc5MqCZJ0r4bEU7SYs8ePdvfdF1NQLzuxP3bkZ3m
 3TsaWcbNoaozvOKpPHZenP85RBE/MxVubWy8PMhzBrAQyeS5KEpWA9TjGTkKPQEeQYqgSTyWm
 /qz0X8fIgqzcH5E6jg7FWSP25bqJStDCGyNJDnuC2Z5zogd7J3FmmdHlcuYFyxV/ppjSE5tLX
 fn8uznab17zFLytpwD5j+D2iP2pAjvQeppfuK6gb2A0AqoAKGcjQdPz8+zOSBBp8TNQAOnXac
 PKN6dNCEn4o0ff/TW070+K199XPdj5otjhaBPiG0UfXAvZuf7L7XO2Tb1AnQU/NWHxHsDRCcr
 b1yeZEtNGsOKyIEDAU9pRi8C7Sk7cz4r6PNSJBgFy3bLHaXOBHge6HYVGiW16f+zIrQC1H5qC
 erBBCYp
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Am 18.05.2018 19:44, schrieb Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com]:
> Am 18.05.2018 08:09, schrieb Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com]:
>>> Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 22:29:41 +0200
>>> From: "Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com]"<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>

[snip]
> E.g.:
> z:\a_very_long_directory_name\another_very_long_directory_name\a_very_long_file_name_with.extension
> is OK because it becomes a valid DOS path like:
> z:\a_very_l\another_v\a_very_l.ext
> as long as it is unique. But if the SFN does not exist for the LFN
> then it does not work. I cannot talk for other DOS implementations.

Please ignore this.  It is misleading.  The issue is quite
simple.  If there are no SFN aliases, then the only valid
LFN is a SFN.  If the LFN is not identical to a SFN then
it will not work for the inspected DOS versions.

Regards,
juan M. Guerrero