X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <5978CB81.6080608@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 19:04:01 +0200
From: "Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101206 SUSE/3.1.7 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Differences between i386go32.sc from the DJGPP port and the one
 provided by the official binutils and question about the status of lto support
 for DJGPP.
References: <xnr2zz3oyj DOT fsf AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <xnr2zz3oyj.fsf@envy.delorie.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:uo3ysMfe5KyqbeCB2/lH8m3hxVne3ahTFnY3R/74CSxg5rdOeuX
 4320MP0bi4J85SlplXLzzvqoH1CzFQMOczCocc2j5eWczMVqogalUmNezjnrbzoaEXvSWS4
 Md/csgRBQZGhXm4QBRPMrPlloZ86ZeRY71yJLDVdot9GkFim5Q7Cvk9zf7qZaWt8oDcJcTV
 IaLKrgM9qcbRAmj7HTlfQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:RcfpNtxr1BY=:6zAE0XBrZclQci2lJ2hNgU
 QBLc9RecNfk+/W77A2rozNMHSDH6rZE9IUUXN4aeE0sn2dSGvYBQ7+IA2RBLqe1UJm6OjRIXq
 QI7YrSnCsxgoMwGYWXP5uXFc8a2cNnJdCbHNPGrBbnve6GcVequCo6ewOHZ/uj01tD7BJ6Z0e
 SfiRRu5z9GMsMVHq50u+e3xZ8gS9vm/wIS2UMBej3a6FS8QUUCin62tlFNHdVwiPp7GRwdo+4
 KaAW5nlSqW3x3SpTNCZMXiyFNDQ15iCkEu/4htqu3Z5c9Ajzk71mtKC5W/Jtwq9Y1g/xUKRvN
 mqWCcCR0qB59TufXdiRfUZZjyANZK5u4dhdyPYuu+OcqRdESKCd0kqGpByOBSSpLJnc5pg7D6
 V4zgWVR3sUF4YnU1G2g9KC1m/Rk9eRJ8hAEMNWCOqmqXQD+wTyMcNc/a4B8grWIarWSG+EGU7
 Px/ZcSBJ20urkumNaXtmYLbnaajG48cuJ2w8GDcRhZln+Lgz/e8StDHx0g77+ZFGSfQtgYDTS
 FYBVrPeCHy/f/lmLPRM33ss1pC+RO6rWCoXf5YvFaBFTlRJo+KTuS0jaK7l3WGKiJsT1RTvDf
 Uk464uBpW6BWkRsYsPCkRKAtq780Xa02gGcJCDKAP9NsdazGXQGqiHZ0Mv/X5TBCowl4TOnP6
 FsA1kTbqzWWh5Cz2OVBPbCJ8z4oQbjUU8aF6J5opKMyTc88fBaZrw0b9jmjSEC8TR7Q2uONO8
 e6QBeTWbuBz87ZxEH8vjQpiwccRv08o8XaMK5A7kJDje3WLFisQU1iHUsxDTuYajiRJs5GCDO
 go4ZFJZGFOPM8cfnew3XAh0cIrgG0FY64k+FYLcGB6Nmrsi4G0=
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Am 09.05.2017 01:31, schrieb DJ Delorie:
>
> Decide what "needs" to be in there is likely Andris's thing, although
> having unused patterns usually isn't a problem.
>
> As for the binutils maintainer, that's me :-)
>
> And the i386go32.sc file is already djgpp-specific...


I would like to call your attention on this issue again bacause a new version
of binutils has been released a couple of days before and this patch has not
been commited AFAIK.  We have again a not fully functional linker script for
libc of DJGPP 2.05.  IMO the patch can be applied as it is, even if it
disables lto support.  May be we get it committed for the next release.

Regards,
Juan M. Guerrero