X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KLZsjhhyIDwGaBkxS0eJkaN7BGJbkODrGCQbmZi+uwM=; b=PymWwQYGHj8PMCYvLOR94ka3hHUJEsEYKVylDqWhXKMZnL/BXUejULI14Q5Orh+vag s8ektyrP5TDu9QFrIHn5/4OtpIkegIZJDQhXCbztB3PmWBr16yxO5QDDXwQaKeXEyGPh 3eHP+08btdnxlf5pgMCkRY5cXeuBwEk4mv1y3a/tLk98CNLblUBHGIzlcteLq0ltCW2W 0YOefcT8hlMKuM8Qi6lGIHVncBfEhXfmXMUxP/Bhn4lHIqLVV8ALd30Lwib9j0f7byB4 RCsYjcxUuAPyheME49SFqe0Hiw+nMtr94akguqIDSQerMzzehEM5CLcCh+fKdX9sX6XQ 5UbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=KLZsjhhyIDwGaBkxS0eJkaN7BGJbkODrGCQbmZi+uwM=; b=jo1GFpt3riasO4bs4bBqK0PsPfDhwNd5eQi0Jal2D4MSxKeFR/fyomsn6jjAP2Mlwd LpLlaBc5koW7uyvl3MOEGTpvUA4y0SlTnLq8yCMBpcoSntZKMr0IsPMYuXtrZHM9JByx 5ys2p12si77D6Xcnfqg/+UNdXdHbGWMghX/Z5g8XZnoPXpKOssiDxIW+EXe6CVh34y6w mN4FP0VE/g/W9FA6DScVLNJ9/He0aloiUzmx5qUP1Pu2A/l19yCBJUbNWv6v0Hn3GVTS QKDOKH/42Q7gd3PB/Ys6c4dUhagrIJFgj+5Xjdhcb9WgnCAdQcFCls7d3PFphNKGWX6G 2c9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvfpGIBUzBON7tOpd1+6susiehjfXvgyaqX2J8SQnOErR+HbFUpObbPoGYHe9a0TdnRcIaH6xoK+O4Bfg== X-Received: by 10.31.149.132 with SMTP id x126mr47083272vkd.71.1470575122153; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 06:05:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: "Rugxulo (rugxulo AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com]" Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 08:05:21 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linking more bloat from ctime.c To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Hi, On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Rugxulo wrote: > > So I whipped up a quick attempt to fix this. > > === ctime.dif begins === > ... > + newres[24]='\n'; > ... > === ctime.dif ends === Oops! That line should probably?? be this instead: + newres[24]='\n'; newres[25]='\0'; > Should I brute-force try to run through every time_t since 1970 to make sure that there are no bugs? Thus, a slightly improved example follows: === asctime.c begins === #include #include void say(const char* s) { for (size_t i=0; s[i]; i++) putchar(s[i]); } int main(void) { struct tm t = { .tm_isdst = -1, .tm_year = 70, .tm_mday = 1, .tm_mon = 6, .tm_yday = 180, .tm_hour = 13, .tm_min = 41, .tm_sec = 0, .tm_wday = 0, }; time_t blah; for (int i=0; i <= 135; i++) { blah=mktime(&t); say(asctime(localtime(&blah))); t.tm_year++; } return 0; } === asctime.c ends === Okay, that's enough for now. :-P