X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=ZZCkPExxxHM6J8IQW0T2d8UCAnqiY6ZszTjWTGZ75os=;
        b=wj/NIhGp13ckKoxpBt+xClYtMOII/wqUvYXYAZvzLgaccPpnjoZDd/5B1/czS4E6wO
         flCh6UgUq6x0nzjJX6E9ihbcNk3XWiXNtH3imyDdV79xs7wdUFpm5Q00HChBTufj4xhk
         yaZkc6iqm9kbIROt/Ai5+S0atv2ZTW1l2h5BRZnDuYqfpAhI2Qhw08xK9AngKDZDkLuL
         XuB6G70pp+KtlKZcOPloffWfrrLTofuDXepszev6r0+OeAYbxdKf3KePMGrVAUxTEBY4
         QgJpkLyKC8IJqsCw6eaNbn7ExfZmj6wHtElsEDizJh1Wm64duuNor6UszeI456n7gAff
         crFw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.174.3 with SMTP id r3mr40762003qcz.10.1381782825451;
 Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <83hadflxpu.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <523A2796 DOT 8040908 AT gmx DOT de>
	<CAA-ihx8pNts+hdyET=Yxibd7Pb+3BnG_bLdCmHOc2Jbi_YHCzg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<523B7D0C DOT 5010508 AT gmx DOT de>
	<83hadflxpu DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:33:45 -0500
Message-ID: <CAA-ihx-Bz8nYBRcwhWj7LmGzc2naVSQCV11o-4tQesQ8VNkFkw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Implementation of the [l]lrint[f|l] family of functions.
From: Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org> wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 00:39:08 +0200
>> From: Juan Manuel Guerrero <juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
>>
>> But writing the code makes more fun than copying and pasting the code
>> of someone else.  It has also the benefit that I do not need to care
>> about copyright issues that may raise and as long as my own code is not
>> substantially worse than the code of others I will prefer my own one.
>
> The copyright issue is the real reason: I can hardly believe that
> newlib (or, in fact, any free software out there) will have a license
> that is compatible with DJGPP.

What does DJGPP try to do, be the same as FreeBSD's license? (Or so I
naively thought.)

Well, I did read a very little bit about musl lately, and it's MIT, so
maybe that would be acceptable to glean from:

http://www.musl-libc.org/