X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:45:12 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: About new DJGPP v2.04 beta In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1 AT inter DOT net DOT il To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Message-id: <83txo4y1tj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5140A042 DOT 9050805 AT iki DOT fi> <83d2usznat DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:55:06 -0500 > From: Rugxulo > > You'd have to recompile both of them with the same (latest?) compiler. > They most assuredly use older GCCs, which may or may not be worse on > your given cpu, esp. using our default "-mtune=pentium". I don't think CPU and code tuning is relevant, as most of the time is taken by I/O. > BTW, they're already noticeably slower than native DOS tools for > similar functionality. If you want to compare "dir /s/b" with something, compare it with "ls -R". You cannot meaningfully compare it with 'find', since the latter is not meant to just show the file names. > "redir -t current /zips" = Elapsed time: 7.250 seconds > "redir -t beta /zips" = Elapsed time: 12.750 seconds That's a significant difference. I doubt that it could be explained by testing for symlinks, but if that's the reason, symlink support needs some serious optimization before it can be considered ready for prime time, IMO. Thanks.