X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=SSbQYbjdqp3f1isXsadC3Fr74UdWlpuIiqqvbvdGUt4=;
        b=wCwol3BsJ6n7ZkXVHkC4khfhomPh+73pDb6g2HgQvYqIV0fZAvj1yOxRJupxnwYfaK
         t7u6ERqVLjG3ge0ExXtBnDh9WTIVIHkd2OzXILNsIg18N5HRdsHH16i03j1HJVW3d3wa
         K1AEYRZ6jibm+yT/mrYVJ/8AQc45M+sAUmJG3ifSdfLj1h+zPTrggTWicIOFtz0/Yd+o
         hMXBShRWztkdGj1JEBqajCgTBqr80TtIq0hegSmjM3y2QK0hK7ShGekq32imsKpr7pit
         wk5zjHmat156P0axfrjv4RbFvZ/elA0t7uSgprfNQNnWuORzvAuO4PUZmIWqTpqrSjmU
         1cIw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.31.170 with SMTP id b10mr888101oei.34.1360905246023; Thu,
 14 Feb 2013 21:14:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAA2C=vCOz-oFNsMG7QqxxqY+8f-Ztjh_TsEXnhUdYGGJeK9fYw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA2C=vCOz-oFNsMG7QqxxqY+8f-Ztjh_TsEXnhUdYGGJeK9fYw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 23:14:05 -0600
Message-ID: <CAA-ihx8X8XExDDvajkEGrH+xrHZ7rp3FwSoGnvshY47_WeaDgw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: inttypes.h r1.4
From: Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>
> What is the point of r1.4 commit to inttypes.h where an additional
> stdint.h include is added?  stdint.h is already included at the top of
> the file?

http://www.delorie.com/bin/cvsweb.cgi/djgpp/include/inttypes.h?rev=1.4

Yes, you're right, it's there twice, oops. There was a small
discussion about it recently, hence the tweak. Instead of assuming it
was just an oversight, I'm going out on a limb (since I can't "prove"
it) and guessing that somehow the first one isn't being read in during
some circumstances (perhaps "-std=c89").

http://www.delorie.com/bin/cvsweb.cgi/djgpp/include/stdint.h?rev=1.6

Okay, I just don't know. The only difference between the two include
uses seems to be "#ifndef __dj_ENFORCE_ANSI_FREESTANDING". Slightly
confusing.

http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp-workers/2013/02/01/19:22:17

I don't know what Juan encountered exactly with UnRTF. I guess we'll
wait and see what he says.   :-)