X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:54:26 -0500 Message-Id: <201301142154.r0ELsQY9009009@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: [stefano DOT lattarini AT gmail DOT com: Please don't kill DJGPP support...] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Could someone please check the automake-git in a few days and see if indeed DJGPP support works again? Thanks! DJ Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:23:35 +0100 From: Stefano Lattarini To: DJ Delorie CC: automake-bug AT gnu DOT org Subject: Please don't kill DJGPP support... In-Reply-To: <201301131922 DOT r0DJMaGX024244 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Severity: wishlist Reference: I'm moving this discussion to bug-automake, so that is will be registered in our bug tracker, for easier future reference. On 01/13/2013 08:22 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > The DJGPP project is still quite alive, with most GNU projects having > up to date builds for DJGPP. > But is it really useful today? That is, Unix emulation under MS systems means MinGW/MSYS or Cygwin today. And while DJGPP was a tremendous help and an amazing piece of software back in its heydays, I'm not sure it is really relevant anymore now (apart for its aficionados, but that could be said for almost any good software). > Since the DJGPP project relies heavily > on being able to build the GNU projects, dropping support in Automake > means that any project updating their Automake scripts will be forced > to drop DJGPP support, whether the project desires that or not. > > If such a trend continues, the Automake team will have effectively > killed off the whole DJGPP project single-handedly. > > Is there any particular reason why support might be dropped? > The main reason were two: 1. the perceived (on my part) irrelevance DJGPP today, and 2. the extra complexity introduced by the need of supporting its '.iNN' info files. But now that Automake is planned to drop support for split info files anyway (see ), that second motivation might as well have become irrelevant. And the other pieces of code required to support DJGPP are few and unobtrusive enough that I can consider re-introducing them if I get convinced DJGPP is not truly irrelevant yet. So, in a few days, I hope to be able to push to Automake's git repository an experimental branch that incorporates the changes removing support for split info files, *and* reverts some of the changes where I dropped DJGPP support (that is, all but the Texinfo-related ones). If that is enough to make DJGPP support work again (you or some other interested party will have to test this is the case), then I will consider re-introducing that support. Regards, Stefano