X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=GYtfoZT+4bO2DC3nRKnSVvTF3tYtQpBef/f2hNdVFVc=;
        b=PRiEZoDIpb3+xU6b9HCpi3T9k1mjea3+HffDN/csf8N6c4eddgqZ1WmgdUYM1yMWbz
         AR4Fqlq/YQ7jWq5jdJjakK8J23wNV7Zf5ly8PFdx5lx9Y+3XrkOaS5M0Agpyzo6EdIzj
         4Ngd3psXm7VCr+JnyIZHaRigEU//dsxWpzj3WQEoqBYvb1zupCiGRCdKS9UHPfb2WN0L
         tCsr0GOpUOcI8ZYNaPBihf8l4mPU/WL8V9tnE8qP/7njXoU3h3e1H1JiUPjuh5uq/KKv
         3WmGmc9zzLE8UICRu3KIIxc/iD+QTReLA47w8kZ5wKeloXn8hPF+IvOxD+zq7lzNORBK
         HQ9g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <83sjcw9rpu.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAA-ihx9exryc-z2z30W3E+WsJG_rERTKjrMbE9D6=WbAvyrf-Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201207130044 DOT q6D0iXDf015563 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<83sjcw9rpu DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:45:45 -0500
Message-ID: <CAA-ihx-5PKv2+UoO6dr8iur8w7z8231gCcGa7B-9RXs1h3NkeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: mktemp() fails on "detmp.xxx" but not "detmp.XXX" (proposed patch)
From: Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org> wrote:
>
> Anyway, I think given the slim chances that there will ever be another
> DJGPP release, I think this is a moot point.  Any changes in the
> library at this time are unlikely to help DJGPP users.

Just use one of Andris or Ozkan's temporary builds (from CVS) and
refresh the 2.04 beta .ZIPS on the mirrors. Keep it 2.04 but
unofficially call it "beta2". At least then Juan wouldn't have to keep
patching popen.    ;-)

I haven't heard much lately, CWS is always busy, but he indeed (as of
like two years ago) was still very very interested in pushing out a
new release "eventually". So I wouldn't quite say no one is
interested.

I'm fairly useless, but even I'm willing to help in small ways if at
all possible.

With FreeDOS, DOSEMU, DOSBox, VirtualBox, et al., there's no reason to
totally give up on DJGPP. But maybe I'm being too naively optimistic
here.