X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:12:32 -0500
Message-Id: <E1RopjE-0007zt-3j@fencepost.gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <201201212321.49139.juan.guerrero@gmx.de> (message from Juan
	Manuel Guerrero on Sat, 21 Jan 2012 23:21:49 +0100)
Subject: Re: relocation counter overflow flag for coff.h
References: <201201212321 DOT 49139 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Juan Manuel Guerrero <juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
> Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 23:21:49 +0100
> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
> 
> To be able to signal that the relocation counter has been overflow I would
> suggest to add the following flag to coff.h.  The value of 0x01000000 is the
> same than the one used by PE COFF but arbitrary.  It could be any other one.

I'm fine with this value, thanks.

But why do you make gratuitous whitespace changes in the header as
part of this change?  They create an impression that everything is
modified, rather than that only one line is being added.

What's wrong with the original whitespace anyway?