X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=Vl2orqc7JQ3Byll23tb7mlo2dkQ4g+IxUdAYY6Df8k4=;
        b=x9wy9HYNwSD7LZdyX+qD7ZSsDmhsjU3c/JwNKRBguY5Wkrxj0P9rtVUoydJ0gZdHhp
         bM25nYerRFOA7dEAkzt4dJaqwti0nEVZwZaGgndLllpFbGcfNbvYe8NvENA5NtWigPot
         vmJdcSIIwLrbs8TOaTSlqh0brSjIIR7zuyQi8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201109282235.01944.juan.guerrero@gmx.de>
References: <201109282235 DOT 01944 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:40:29 +0300
Message-ID: <CAA2C=vC51ca3kqtTFhVP5g8gQVNT_=GfAbm_Fb_eRKv8pL5F_A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Issues concerning the INT 21 Windows95 - LONG FILENAME
 FUNCTIONS (0x71XX) implementation.
From: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p8SM8YUK031140
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Juan Manuel Guerrero
<juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> wrote:
> This is the last version of the patch to presented by me to fix the pending
> issues concerning the use of 0x7XX functions from the LFN API of windows.
> All reported bugs have been fixed.  Where appropiate the CF is set by ORing
> the register value, else it is simply set to 1.  This patch only fixes the 2.04
> version of djdev.  It has been compiled and tested with gcc 4.6.1 and gcc 3.4.4.
> There is no 2.03 support.
> For 2.03 support a mayor effort will be required.  See the thread:
> <http://www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp-workers/2011/09/17/11:39:42>
> and others.  This effort could only be justified if new djdev203[bs].zip files
> would be uploaded.  I do not think that any average djgpp user will check out
> the djdev203 branch from the repository and build his one fixed libc.  So DJ
> must decide if this is worth to be done.
> Concerning this patch, I will wait a couple of days and if no one complains
> I will commit it.
>
> Regards,
> Juan M. Guerrero

Made an interdiff of the previous and the current version and
noticed that in ansi/stdio/_rename.c and ansi/stdio/remove.c
you specifically moved setting of CF out of the if(LFN) like
condition i.e. always setting it regardless of LFN: can it have
any side effects?

--
O.S.