X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=PlCJfGRFWJp1KCqqBLP3Opp2qPf4azc9feVAeLENTX4=;
        b=LC5KtiGx5K+t3josW4NiXD09n1QUz5RuZiPLytGWko21UNvxuTOHni9nwOrzlGkYzs
         zFhB7y7EwUpO4s6csxTTRUqzkdpeOen7R9bzctYsECMOCJA3UPdmLHGqca57omTrmpcj
         pbTJyj4paM0qbQzvpdpEeRfDUjXYZjn8ZP3CE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <83hb63dij8.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAA2C=vCTyDxWBgYzoBB31=hoOBHJhL+famn_6XL2eYb3a_3egA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83zkjwcknb DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vBJEgnGapVsNwy7xW9HUCy0Rpxis2P5=05mxBze_qn7vQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83wrf0chf4 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vBtiNnx1XPVHw_6Er1uf0_biO3vpaBEa0zeYQuZKh5BxA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83mxfwc634 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vDnictpZNcsF6UV1Did=WPvmvHM9eSQtT8R5fyTr738cA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83k4b0c4ya DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vCK0BR-DVYtGjezM9UgShSzkFacf-HsxWjvN5iQcBWiGQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83hb63dij8 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:18:28 +0300
Message-ID: <CAA2C=vCS5TTimNTqWD7EpDwDY4dBKL1-VXN=Yx51Ud5HzzV7Qg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] allow 64 bit host tools when cross compiling
From: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p6UDIYXB024515
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org> wrote:
>> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:48:18 +0300
>> From: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
>>
>> OK then.  Do you need a new patch or will you edit?
>
> No need for another patch, I installed it with the changes discussed.
>
> Thanks.
>

My pleasure.  However, I noticed that you kept the packed
attributes of the structs which I moved from members. Don't know
whether that was your intention.

--
O.S.


PS:  The src tree still doesn't build using new gcc, though:
http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp-workers/2011/07/01/14:12:23
The solution is there but not applied because DJ wanted a test result
and no one sent me a testcase for it. Sigh...